Definition of Infertility in Surrogacy Laws

Why We Need a Clear, Inclusive Definition of Infertility in Surrogacy Laws

In Australia today, people who still have their reproductive organs but are nonetheless unable to conceive or sustain a pregnancy are often deemed ineligible for surrogacy by ART providers. This narrow interpretation of medical need means that many are encouraged to undergo repeated rounds of IVF — even in cases where there is little to no chance of success.

For those living with documented infertility, such as repeated failed embryo transfers or recurrent miscarriage, this approach can be devastating. Unless they have undergone a hysterectomy or another definitive surgical intervention, many are denied access to surrogacy altogether.  This is because there is no uniform definition of a “medical need” for surrogacy in surrogacy legislation.

The Human Impact of Restrictive Criteria

The current approach can place individuals and couples in a painful cycle:

  • Multiple IVF cycles despite poor prognoses.
  • Mounting emotional distress and physical exhaustion.
  • Significant financial burden with diminishing hope.

This is not only a matter of medical inefficiency — it is a matter of compassion, fairness, and human dignity.

The Problem with Inconsistent Definitions

Without clear statutory guidance, fertility specialists and reviewing bodies have wide discretion in determining what constitutes a “medical need” for surrogacy in Australia. This discretion can be applied inconsistently, leading to uncertainty and inequity in access to surrogacy arrangements.

Towards a Fairer and More Compassionate Framework

There is no doubt that a uniform approach to surrogacy laws is an essential way forward in Australia.  Those uniform laws should adopt a clear, inclusive, and clinically grounded definition of “medical need” for surrogacy that recognises a range of medical realities. 

By embedding such definitions in law — and ensuring they are applied consistently by all assisted reproductive technology (ART) service providers and reviewing bodies — we can create a framework that truly reflects the needs of those it is meant to serve.

The Path Forward

Infertility is not always visible. It is not always solved by “just trying again.” And it should never be defined solely by the absence of reproductive organs. Reforming surrogacy laws to reflect a medically accurate and compassionate understanding of “medical need” is an essential step towards ensuring fairness, dignity, and hope for all who dream of becoming parents.

If you are looking for an experienced Australian surrogacy lawyer, we offer expert legal advice on all aspects of surrogacy.

About The Family Village

The Family Village was founded by our leading Lawyer, Katie. Katie navigated her way through many years of IVF treatments (both the ups and the downs) to create her family. Unfortunately, after the birth of her second child, carrying her own children was no longer an option. Together with her husband, she went on a 5-year journey to find a surrogate. Their precious son Vinnie was born via surrogacy in 2022.
With a passion to assist and support others through their journey in creating a family, Katie established The Family Village. With 16 years legal experience, Katie provides legal advice and services, education, support and guidance to those on their journey to create a family, particularly in surrogacy arrangements.
Katie and her surrogate Sally, work side by side at The Family Village to support surrogates and intended parents alike. They have the benefit of walking in your shoes, from both sides of the story, which is a valuable asset.